Legal Opinion

Scheider v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 25, 1980No. Nos. NN-153, NN-154, NN-226 and NN-227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Judge.

Defendants below appeal judgments and sentences, after pleas of nolo contendere, for possession of controlled substances.

We affirm the trial court.

Defendants were arrested pursuant to a search warrant which in turn grounded its probably cause on information gained from a wiretap. They contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress the fruits of the wiretap because the police failed to use sufficient “other investigative techniques” before seeking court authorization for the interception.

§ 934.09(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1977) requires that any application for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. News-Press Pub. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Cuba v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API