Cole v. Eckstein
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMurphy, J.
I agree with the holding of the majority opinion that the testimony of Donna Eckstein regarding the speed of plaintiffs car at the time of the accident was properly admitted. I also agree with the majority opinion that the jury instruction in question was inapplicable and should not have been given in this case. I dissent from the majority opinion to the extent that the majority holds that the instructional error was harmless.
The decision to give a particular instruction to the jury is within the discretion of the trial court. Williams v Coleman, 194 Mich App 606, 623; 488 NW2d 464 (1992). If…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Reisman v. Regents of Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Duke v. American Olean Tile Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wiegerink v. Mitts & MerrillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.