Legal Opinion
Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1970No. 13381PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
The Secretary of Labor appeals from a decision that W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc. (Hartin),1 a mechanical contractor engaged in the installation and repair of central heating and air-conditioning systems, was exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The district judge concluded that Hartin was not “engaged in the business of construction or reconstruction, or both,” as used in § 3(s) (3) which prescribes coverage.2 He also held that Hartin was eligible for exemption from the overtime provisions of the Act as a “retail or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Brian F. Monahan v. County Of Chesterfield, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Flood v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Monahan v. County of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Turner v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.