Legal Opinion

Hengstler v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1934No. 25,881PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

Appellant was convicted of rape in the first degree upon a female child under the age of sixteen years.

Error is predicated upon the overruling of appellant’s motions for a new trial and to withdraw the submis sion of the cause on account of misconduct of the prosecuting attorney. Error is also assigned upon the overruling of appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment, but this error and the specification in the motion for a new trial that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence are expressly waived.

Complaint is made of instruction No. 4 that it assumes to tell the jury what was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Gipe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Mann v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Dobbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Davenport v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Property Owners, Inc. v. City of AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API