Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Heft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Caroline J. Taylor, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the llth day of April, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 10th day of May, 1911,. denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

The complaint alleged that between April 2, 1899, and August 8, 1903, the plaintiff, at the defendant’s request, furnished board and care of the defendant’s son Stanley, which was reasonably worth, and for which the defendant agreed to pay, the sum of $10,400.

The parties resided at Bridgeport, Conn. The plaintiff kept hoarders.

Stanley Heft was a young man twenty-six years of age. The plaintiff claimed that he was a victim of the morphine ■habit and she testified to the contract upon which she sued, as follows: “He [referring to the defendant] talked at length about their not being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Root v. King & VerplanckNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Corning v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Gough v. St. JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Fowler v. Ætna Fire Insurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Pratt v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grant v. PendleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Wolff v. MahrerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API