Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. Foster
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 9, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Before us for disposition in our original jurisdiction are cross applications for summary relief. The instant case began when the Pennsylvania Osteopathic Medical Association (POMA) filed a petition for review in the nature of a complaint for a declaratory judgment. POMA has alleged that it is a non-profit corporation and an association representing approximately three thousand Pennsylvania osteopathic physicians. Named as respondents are the Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Association (PIGA), Constance B. Foster, Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) and Joseph Pulcini, Jr.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies v. Argonaut InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Paratransit Ass'n of Delaware Valley, Inc. v. YerusalimCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Borough of Jefferson v. Century III AssociatesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Borough of Jefferson v. Century III AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Main Line Health, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Valley Medical Facilities, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- PA. OSTEOPATHIC MED. ASS'N v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Storms v. O'Malley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1998
- Valley Medical Facilities Inc. v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County2004