Legal Opinion

Tibbs v. Boemi

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 16, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

109 N.J. Super. 200 (1970)

262 A.2d 893

VINCENTE TIBBS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HENRY BOEMI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 2, 1970.

Decided March 16, 1970.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Richard A. Kurland argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Bernard Chasen argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, J.A.D.

As the court noted in City of Clifton v. Zweir, 36 N.J. 309, 311-312 (1962):

The Municipal Planning Act of 1953, N.J.S.A. 40:55-1.1, et seq., applicable to all municipalities, provides for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Clifton v. ZweirSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Newman v. Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Gillson v. HeffernanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Clay v. BrowneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Clay v. BrowneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lehrhaupt v. FlynnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Fivehouse v. Passaic Valley Water Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Golaine v. CardinaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. State v. ElyseeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Schere v. Township of FreeholdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API