Leary v. Norfolk Southern Bus Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHIll, J.
One of the primary allegations of negligence is that the defendant parked or left its bus standing upon the paved or improved or main traveled portion of the highway in violation of sec. 123 (a), ch. 407, Public Laws 1937. The evidence in respect thereto tended to show that the driver of the defendant’s bus was in the act of stopping or had stopped the bus on the improved or paved portion of the highway for the purpose of permitting a passenger to alight, and that the shoulder of the road was of sufficient width to permit the driver to drive off of the hard surface before stopping. The only…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Kastler v. TuresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Henry v. S. Liebovitz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- American Company of Arkansas v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Meece v. DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Skinner v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McGehee v. StevensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Stevens v. ShawNebraska Supreme Court · 1965