Legal Opinion

Rose v. Dempster Mill Manufacturing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1903No. 12,834PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Gage county: Charles B. Letton, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, C.

Plaintiff in error, Ella M. Rose, obtained a decree in the district court for the foreclosure of a certain real estate mortgage against Dempster Mill Manufacturing Company, defendant in error, together with certain others who were the mortgagors. The premises were sold for much less than the amount due on the .decree; the sale was confirmed, and afterwards a deficiency judgment was rendered, by default, against the defendant for the remainder due on the decree, on the alleged ground that it had as- . sumed and agreed to pay the mortgage debt. Afterwards *28defendant filed a petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cockle Separator Manufacturing Co. v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co. v. WallaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. W. V. Morse & Co. v. EngleNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Wunrath v. Peoples Furniture & Carpet Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Continental Trust Co. v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Porter v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Coulter v. GudehusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API