Legal Opinion
Jose Ortiz v. Greyhound Corporation and Frank Robert Liberati
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1960No. 7988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.
This action was instituted by plaintiff appellant, Jose Ortiz, against The Greyhound Corporation, a public carrier, and Frank Robert Liberati to recover damages for injury suffered by Ortiz when he was struck by a Greyhound bus as it was backing from its stall at the Baltimore terminal. The case was properly removed from the Superior Court of Baltimore City to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Trial of the case resulted in a jury verdict of $5,000.00 in favor of Ortiz, but the District Court granted Greyhound’s motion for judgment non…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Carroll v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Olen (Allen) Lee v. Nathan Habib, Olen Lee v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Maryland Ex Rel. Gliedman v. Capital Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Marshall v. United AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Federal Insurance Company v. Ada Ligia Bonilla Colon, Etc., Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Ada Ligio Bonilla Colon, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.