Meyer v. Rothe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from tbe decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. .Justice Morris
delivered the opinion of the Court:
In an interference proceeding in the Patent Office, wherein the matter of controversy was an improvement in apparatus for oxidizing hosiery, all the tribunals of the Patent Office awarded judgment of priority of invention in favor of the appellee Rothe; and there would seem to be but little ground to question the justice and propriety of the decision *98were it not that a somewhat novel question has been raised in regard to the admissibility of a certain deposition used in the case, and upon which, it is claimed, the decision depends.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Shutte v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- City Fire Insurance v. CarrugiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- McKinney v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.