Legal Opinion

Bell Clothes Shops, Inc. v. Kamber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

The plaintiff’s action is brought to recover damages for the failure of the defendant to deliver goods claimed to have been purchased by the plaintiff. The contract claimed was to purchase 450 suits of men’s clothes at agreed prices. The defense relied upon is the Statute of Frauds which was duly pleaded. (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 85, as added by Laws of 1911, chap. 571.) The only memorandum upon which the plaintiff relies is a memorandum of sale given by the defendant’s agent, which had upon the letterhead the defendant’s name. It was not otherwise signed by any one. In this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linn v. McLeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Pettibone v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leonard C. Pratt Co. v. RosemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Rubin v. Inwood Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Van Decar v. StreeterNew York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API