Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Philadelphia Contributionship for Insurance of Houses from Loss by Fire

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1909No. 99PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON,

District Judge. This controversy was heard upon bill and answer. The facts are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows: In March, 1752, certain persons in the city of

Philadelphia entered into a mutual agreement or deed of settlement of which the object appears in the following paragraph:

““Whereas ihe Insurance of Houses from Loss by Fire hath, where the same has been practised, proved very useful and advantageous to the Publick:
“Now know ye, that we the said Subscribers hereunto, as well for our own mutual Security as for the common Security and Advantage of our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Spahr v. Farmers' BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Freeland v. Pennsylvania Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Hamilton v. Clarion R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. Philadelphia Contributionship for Insurance of Houses from Loss by FireCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API