Legal Opinion

Shulinsky v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 7, 1927PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

It is not necessary to consider whether the statutory requirement that jurors shall be indifferent (P. L., c. 321, s. 31) could be found to be complied with. By P. L., c. 339, s. 19, each party in a civil cause may take three peremptory challenges. If this right of challenge is lost or impaired, the statutory conditions and terms for setting up an authorized jury are not met.

“The right to challenge a given number of jurors without showing cause is one of the most important of the rights secured to the accused. . . . Any system for the empanelling of a jury-that prevents or embarrasses the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. People v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Consolidated Gas & Equipment Company of America v. Clarence F. Carver and La Junta Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API