Legal Opinion
Weissenstein v. Burlington Board of School Commissioners
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 5, 1988No. 86-152PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
The superior court has certified the following question for determination pursuant to V.R.A.P. 5(a):
Is the agency fee agreement between the Burlington Board of School Commissioners and the Burlington Education Association contrary to the terms and provisions of the Labor Relations for Teachers Act (Chapter 57 of Title 16, Vermont Statutes Annotated)?
We answer the certified question in the affirmative and remand.
According to the stipulated facts, the plaintiffs are all teacher-employees of the defendant, Burlington Board of School Commissioners (Board). They are in the bargaining unit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paquette v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Lomberg v. CrowleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- New Jersey Turnpike Employees' Union, Local 194 v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Churchill v. S. A. D. 49 Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Slocum v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. RiendeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- All Star Group, LLC Subdivision Permit Denial - Decision on Motion (Summary Judgment)Vermont Superior Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.