Legal Opinion

Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1985No. 22395PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice.

The South Carolina Public Service Commission (PSC) and South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE & G) appeal the circuit court’s denial of their motion to dismiss. We affirm.

In 1983, SCE & G filed an application with the PSC for an increase in utility rates. The Consumer Advocate for South Carolina, Steven W. Hamm, was granted leave to intervene. Following a hearing, the PSC issued an order granting, in part, SCE & G’s request. Hamm’s petition to reconsider was denied by order dated March 30, 1984.

PSC mailed a copy of the order denying rehearing to Hamm’s office, where…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Parker v. South Carolina Dairy CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Meyer v. PaschalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. South Carolina Coastal Council v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Hopper v. Terry Hunt ConstructionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API