Legal Opinion

United States v. Martinez-Mata

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2004No. 03-40490PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EIDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

This case involves the application of the sixteen-level “crime of violence” sentence enhancement under § 2L1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Appellant Ismael Martinez-Mata’s sentence for illegally reentering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 included a sixteen-level enhancement based on a prior conviction of the Texas crime of retaliation. Martinez-Mata contends that the retaliation offense is not a “crime of violence,” as required by § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), because it does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Andrej Szucz-Toldy v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Martinez-Mata v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Szucz-Toldy, Andrej v. Gonzales, Alberto R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API