United States v. Martinez-Mata
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EIDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
This case involves the application of the sixteen-level “crime of violence” sentence enhancement under § 2L1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Appellant Ismael Martinez-Mata’s sentence for illegally reentering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 included a sixteen-level enhancement based on a prior conviction of the Texas crime of retaliation. Martinez-Mata contends that the retaliation offense is not a “crime of violence,” as required by § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), because it does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Andrej Szucz-Toldy v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Martinez-Mata v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Szucz-Toldy, Andrej v. Gonzales, Alberto R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.