Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Minnfee

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 14, 2011No. 07-11-0160-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion on Original Proceeding.

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Pending before the court is Barry Dwayne Minnfee’s application for a writ of mandamus or habeas corpus. Though much of it is unintelligible, he does state that he “is being deprived of liberty of jail time credit proceedings.” Thus, we construe the document as implicating the recalculation of his prison term through the application of jail time credit, and in so interpreting the petition, we deny it for the following reasons.

Minnfee is not appealing from an order denying him habeas relief. Instead, he initiated an original proceeding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  2. Lesikar v. Anthony, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. In Re Hettler, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte John E. Rodarte Sr., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API