Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Blumer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1924Published

1DissentEschweiler, J.

The two five-year notes of December 12, 1907, and the mortgage securing them were drawn by Durst and held by him continuously thereafter. He first held them as agent of Johnson until the latter’s death in 1912, the notes being then past due. During *380this period the conveyances, Dahms to Keller and Keller to Blumer, were executed. The mortgages given and. other matters connected with these two conveyances were facts of which Durst had personal knowledge.

On Johnson’s death, Durst as executor then held them, but failed to act under sec. 3829, Stats., which declares that such mortgage interest and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bur v. BongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Driscoll v. TillmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hustis v. McWilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API