Legal Opinion

Wemmer v. National Broach & MacHine Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1979No. Docket 77-301, 77-584PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, P.J.,

Do the provisions of MCL 418.351(1); MSA 17.237(351X1) limiting workmen’s compensation benefits to two-thirds of the injured party’s average weekly wage at the time of the injury place an absolute ceiling on differential benefit payments by the second injury fund resulting from increases in maximum benefits payable under MCL 418.355; MSA 17.237(355)? What method of calculation should be used to compute the 5% benefit reductions required by MCL 418.357; MSA 17.237(357) for the recipient of a total and permanent diability award who attains age 65? These questions, the second of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jolliff v. American Advertising Distributors, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. King v. Second Injury FundMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Miller v. Dunn Paper Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Kunde v. Teesdale Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gusler v. Fairview Tubular ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Northwood Apartments v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Reed v. Top Notch Fence InstallersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Wemmer v. National Broach & MacHine Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Brown v. Brimley Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API