Moore v. Bell, Attorney-General
Texas Supreme Court
Original application for the writ of mandamus against the Attorney-General of the State.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
This is an original suit in this court seeking a mandamus against the respondent, C. K. Bell, Attorney-General of the State, to compel him to pay over to the relator certain moneys alleged to be in the hands of the respondent and claimed to belong to the relator. The petition alleges in substance that at the date of the collections made in the several cases stated, the relator was and is now district attorney for the judicial district which embraces Travis County, and that C. K. Bell was then and is now the Attorney-General of the State of Texas. It is alleged that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- State v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Clement v. Paris Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas & T. R. of Texas v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Wexler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Howth v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- State v. Texas Central R. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.