Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Haig

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 30, 1981No. Nos. 80 C 2075, 80 C 3681 and 81 C 1025Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge.

The above consolidated actions, which are based on the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq., are before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The sole issue before the court is the proper application of § 202(e) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1152(e).1 The plaintiffs, fifth and sixth preference Mexican visa applicants,2 contend that § 202(e) should have applied in fiscal year 1980 (“FY 1980”) because the defendants allocated more than 20,000 visa numbers to Mexican consular posts. The defendants3…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Angco v. HaigDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API