Legal Opinion

Wickens v. Goldstone

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Webster District pourt. — Hon. D. R. Hind-man, Judge. Action to recover compensation for services in procuring a purchaser of a stock of goods. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

The plaintiff resides in Webster county, and the defendant in Polk county, Iowa; and, the action being brought in Webster county, the defendant filed a motion, supported by affidavit, to change the place of trial to Polk county, as that of his residence. The application was resisted’ and the facts can be no more concisely presented than by presenting the respective affidavits, as follows:

“N. L. Goldstone on oath states: That he now resides in Polk county, Iowa, and has so resided for more than twenty-five years. That he has not now, and never has had, an office or agency in Webster county,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milligan v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. Ockerson v. Burnham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Locke v. Chicago Chronicle Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Barnabee v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Wood v. FogartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Syndicate Clothing Co. v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Farmers Savings Bank v. Planters Terminal Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API