Legal Opinion

Duffy v. J. W. Bishop Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeleb, J.

The defendant claims that while the contract between it and the Jackson Stone Company, plead as a special defense, may not be a defense to recovery in the action itself, yet it clearly shows an equitable reason for not permitting the latter to collect, and that a defense to that effect may properly be interposed in the action. The action is one in tort by Duffy to recover from defendant damages suffered by reason of the negligence of its servants. The right of action does not flow from any contractual liability, nor are the provisions relative to injuries contained in the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clarke v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Regan v. N. York and N. England R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  3. Stanley v. SteeleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Ansonia Land & Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Fox v. KinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  5. Blake v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API