Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Berryhill

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 3, 2020No. 4:18-cv-05705Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANK EUGENE MCCARTHY, 7 Case No. 18-cv-05705-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT NANCY BERRYHILL, 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 31 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff Frank McCarthy moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the 13 Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found 14 McCarthy not disabled and therefore denied him application for benefits under Titles II and XVI of 15 the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. and

42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API