Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1964PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The defendant was found guilty by the court, sitting without a jury, of the crime of being a convicted felon in possession of a concealed weapon. The only ground of appeal is that there is insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilty.
OB.S 166.270 provides:
“Any unnaturalized foreign-born person or any person who has been convicted of a felony against the person or property of another or against the Government of the United States or of this state, or of any political subdivision of this state, who owns, or has in his possession or under his custody or control any pistol, revolver, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WhitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- People v. LissIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- People v. RussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.