Legal Opinion

In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 11, 1985No. MDL No. 381 (JBW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT

WEINSTEIN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs, Vietnam War veterans and members of their families, sue the United States government to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam. The government has moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment in cases in which it is the only defendant as well as in cases in which it is named as a defendant along with the manufacturers of Agent Orange. For the reasons indicated, the motion must be granted.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY IN BRIEF

The history of the “Agent Orange”…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. St. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Agent Orange Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API