Legal Opinion

State v. Doak

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 2, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

The respondent was charged with the crime of sodomy and convicted by jury verdict. At the close of all of the evidence, respondent moved for a directed verdict. Exception to an adverse ruling upon this motion raises the only issue here presented.

“The rule governing the direction of verdicts in a criminal case is that when the evidence is so defective or weak that a verdict based upon it cannot be sustained, the trial court, on motion, should direct a verdict for the respondent.” State v. Sullivan, 146 Me. 381, 384; State v. Gustin, 123 Me. 307.

The female complainant was fifteen years old at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  2. State v. GustinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. State v. MainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
  3. State v. KingsburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State v. BlierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API