Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Horn v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1947Published

1DissentBrewster, J.

I dissent. The only question presented by this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, there is evidence to support the finding that the claimants, parents of the deceased employee, were dependent upon him within the meaning of the statute, at the time of his accidental death. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16, subd. 4.) A partial dependency of both parents has been found and death benefits have been awarded to them at the full statutory rate.

The mere fact that the deceased made contributions to the parents some of which was used by them in aid of their support, this alone does not' prove…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Claim of Tirre v. Bush Terminal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Claim of Kelley v. Hoefler Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Claim of Schedzick v. Volney Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Claims of Kaiser v. U. S. O. Camp Shows, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API