Legal Opinion

Fazekas v. Perth Amboy Holy Mary Roman Catholic Sick Benefit Society

United States District Court

Decided November 19, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGolbberger, J.

This is a suit to recover “sick” benefits, and the claim of the plaintiff is resisted on the ground that she was not sick but was incapacitated by reason of a fall from the back porch of her home resulting in a fractured elbow. The by-laws in question provided as follows:

“Who belongs in the CC’ group and wants $6.00 sick benefits, pays monthly fifty cents.
“That the illness does not result from drunkenness, fighting, carelessness, venereal diseases or of a trouble which occurred before his joining the society, in such cases he is not entitled to any sick benefit.”

While the rule that all of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaudoin v. La Societe St. Jean Baptiste De Bienfaisance De BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
  2. Villone v. PerticaraAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  3. Murphy v. JolineNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Mis v. Polish Society of Knights of St. Casimir, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API