Legal Opinion

King v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1901No. 896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the-United States-for the Northern District of Ohio. The facts in this case, so far as it is necessary to state the same with a view to an understanding of the questions involved, are as follows: In-1881 the Pittsburg & Western Railroad Company, a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, was organized. It subsequently leased the lines of certain railroads in Ohio.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the-United States-for the Northern District of Ohio. The facts in this case, so far as it is necessary to state the same with a view to an understanding of the questions involved, are as follows: In-1881 the Pittsburg & Western Railroad Company, a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, was organized. It subsequently leased the lines of certain railroads in Ohio. It also had a part of its line in the state of Pennsylvania, and operated altogether a line from Pittsburg to Akron, Ohio. The Pittsburg & Western Railroad Company having made default in the…

1Opinion of the CourtDay, Circuit Judge

Preliminary questions have been argued concerning the sufficiency of the bond and undertaking to bring this case in review before this court, and it is alleged that the assignments of error are insufficient. We have examined these assignments, and, while they are open to criticism as not being entirely specific, nevertheless, in view of the importance of the principal question presented, and the view we take of the case, we have concluded to look into this record, notwithstanding the alleged defects in the manner in which the assignments are made. It is also urged that the Pittsburg & Western…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CushmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Toledo, Delphos & Burlington Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. BouknightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
  2. Gulf, M. & N. R. Co. v. Hill Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Swift v. KortrechtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API