Allen v. Lee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR TO THE DANE CIRCUIT COURT. The plaintiff sued out an attachment in the county court of Dane county on the 17 th day of November, 1853, against the defendant, and- the writ was levied upon lands on the 19th day of November, 1853. At the return term of the writ, February, 1854, the defendant moved the court to dismiss the writ for insufficiency of the affidavit; which motion was sustained, and an alias writ allowed and issued, returnable on the first Monday of May, 1854,…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE DANE CIRCUIT COURT. The plaintiff sued out an attachment in the county court of Dane county on the 17 th day of November, 1853, against the defendant, and- the writ was levied upon lands on the 19th day of November, 1853. At the return term of the writ, February, 1854, the defendant moved the court to dismiss the writ for insufficiency of the affidavit; which motion was sustained, and an alias writ allowed and issued, returnable on the first Monday of May, 1854, and served upon the same lands as the former writ. On the first day of June, 1854, the defendant filed the motion to…
1Opinion of the Court
*479 By the Court,
WhitoN, C. J.
The bill of exceptions in this case states that “ on the 16th day of May, A. D., 1855, at the April term of said court, the above entitled cause was pending in said court, the same having been transferred from the county court of Dane county by operation of the statute, the following motion appearing and remaining on the files of said court, was called up and argued, to wit: “And “now at this day comes the said defendant, Ashbell Lee, by “Yilas, Roys & Pinney, his attorneys, and moves the court “ to dismiss the attachment herein, for the reason that the said “…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kingsley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Hanauer v. BartelsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
- Reedy v. HowardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898