Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 2013No. 3D11-254Published

1Opinion of the Court

*619 ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

SUAREZ, J.

Upon consideration of the State’s motion for rehearing or clarification, we withdraw the opinion of February 20, 2013, grant the motion to clarify, and substitute the following in its place. The motion is considered as directed to the clarified opinion and is otherwise denied.

The defendant, Arturo Rodriguez, appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder with a deadly weapon and for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We reverse, as the trial court failed to conduct a competency hearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API