Legal Opinion
W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 31, 1966No. C.D. 2613PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
Importations from England described in the official entry papers, which have been received in evidence without being *73marked, as “Rubbers only for Everseal A/S facemasks” were classified by the collector of customs as parts of surgical instruments in paragraph 359 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by Presidential Proclamation No. 3468, 97 Treas. Dec. 157, T.D. 55615, supplemented by Presidential Proclamation No. 3479, 97 Treas. Dec. 430, T.D. 55649, and assessed with duty at the rate of 40% per centum ad valorem.
Inasmuch as the merchandise covered by the two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Welding Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969