Legal Opinion

Brian Ritchie v. Sharon Blacketter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2010No. 08-35923, 08-35924Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

The Superintendent of the Eastern Ore gon Correctional Institution appeals the district court’s grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus to Brian Ritchie. We affirm.

We agree with the district court that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced Ritchie’s defense. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Trial counsel did not explain to Ritchie the elements of the offense of compelling prostitution. OR. Rev.Stat. § 167.017(l)(b). Specifically, trial counsel could not answer the question whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API