Legal Opinion
Olim v. WE MAYBERRY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1974No. 46107PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The question presented is the constitutionality of 47 O.S.1971 § 6-204(c) which treats an unvacated forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure a defendant’s appearance in court for a traffic citation as being equivalent to conviction.
In this case convictions of offenses will be considered only for the purposes of the records of the Department of Public Safety, any action it takes with respect to the driver’s license of an individual, and the public reports it makes in respect to an individual driver. We are not considering “conviction” as it applies to offenses in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Suspension of Operator's License of Levin v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Lamb v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Pryor v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- City of Tulsa v. GoinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
3Cited by11 opinions
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- In Re Supreme Court Adjudication of Sufficiency of Initiative Petition in TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Hogg v. Oklahoma County Juvenile BureauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. AlbusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.