Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Double D Hop Ranch v. Sanchez

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1997No. 64561-2Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnson, J.

(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — This case presents the question of whether a general labor farm worker can be classified as an exclusively seasonal worker under RCW 51.08.178. While I agree with the majority’s interpretation of what constitutes an exclusively seasonal worker, I write separately to emphasize that case law from other jurisdictions supports that determination. Further, I disagree with the majority’s belief that the question remains unresolved whether Sanchez’ employment is part-time or intermittent and that he may be subject to wage averaging.

The general rule is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. CarradoWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nilson v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Murillo v. Payroll ExpressNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Pacey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API