Legal Opinion

Quinn v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2003No. 84A01-0210-CR-404PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Tammi Quinn brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the failure to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. We affirm.

Issue

Quinn raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court properly denied her motion to suppress.

Facts

At approximately 8:00 on the evening of August 14, 2001, retired police officer Greg McCoy was working as a security guard at a grocery store in Terre Haute. During his shift, an unknown individual approached McCoy and said that he had seen Quinn in a neighboring parking lot. The stranger also said that Officer Denzil…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. David Lee GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Frank L. FazioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Palmer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  4. Sanchez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API