Legal Opinion
Loftex USA LLC v. Trident Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 15, 2013No. 11 Civ. 9349(PAE)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.
Loftex USA LLC (“Loftex”) brings this action against Trident Limited and Trident Group Limited (collectively, “Trident”), alleging that Trident has infringed and continues to infringe Loftex’s U.S. Patent No. 7,810,308 (“the '308 Patent”), in violation of *37735 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. Trident brings a counterclaim against Loftex, seeking, inter alia, a declaration that the '308 Patent is invalid and void.
In connection with these claims, the parties have asked this Court to construe disputed terms of the '308 Patent. The Court held a Markman hearing in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.