Legal Opinion

Jester v. Jester

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1932No. 7 Div. 134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Complainant, appellant here, filed his bill in the circuit court in equity, to contest the will of E. E. Jester, which had been admitted to probate in common form in the probate court of St. Clair county. The complainant, at the time of filing his bill, mad© due and proper demand for a trial of the issue devisavit vel non by jury, and, under our uniform rulings, the court was without discretion in -granting the jury trial, it was a matter of right. Mathews v. Forniss, 91 Ala. 157, 8 So. 661, 664; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2 Ala. 571; Johnson v. Hainesworth, 6 Ala. 443; Ex parte Colvert, 188 Ala.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  3. Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. McCutchen v. LogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Ex parte ColvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Owens v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Ex Parte CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Farmers Merchants Bank of Ashville v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Clarke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Wood v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API