Legal Opinion

Broocks v. . Muirhead

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1943PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

While three questions are presented on this appeal by defendants, all of them are answered by applying the principles of dedication or equitable estoppel, and of incident remedy.

When the owner of land has it subdivided and platted into lots, streets and alleys, and sells and conveys the lots or any of them with reference to the plat, he thereby dedicates the streets and alleys, and all of them, to the use of the purchasers and those claiming under them, and of the public. See Ins. Co. v. Carolina Beach, 216 N. C., 778, 7 S. E. (2d), 13, and authorities cited.

In Hughes v. Glark, 134 N. C.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Hughes v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Sexton v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Green v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Lee v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Steadman v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Gaither v. Albemarle Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API