Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Heenan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from -Tones District Court. — Hon. James I). G-ifeen, Judge. Appeal from an order for the sale of attached property. '

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— On the third day of April, 1885, plaintiff commenced an action against J. C. Campbell, which was aided by attachment, to recover the amount due on a foreign judgment. On the next day the writ of attachment was levied upon seventy shares of the capital stock of the Olin Tile & Brick Company, as the property of Campbell. On the ninth day of May, 1885, D. Heenan presented to the court below his petition, under section 3016 of the Code, claiming to be the owner of the attached stock by virtue of a purchase made by him from Campbell on or about January 1, 1885. On the eleventh day of December,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howe & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Sperry v. EthridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Linden v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Des Moines Savings Bank v. Morgan Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Conkling v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Woods v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API