Whitaker v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
A. Best Interest
In her first point on appeal, Whitaker argues that the circuit court erred in finding that termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of her children. In making a "best interest" determination, the circuit court is required to consider two factors: (1) the likelihood that the child will be adopted and (2) the potential of harm to the child if custody is returned to a parent.
*727Ford v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. , 2014 Ark. App. 226, at 2, 434 S.W.3d 378, 380 ; Tucker v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. , 2011 Ark. App. 430, 389 S.W.3d 1. Whitaker challenges the circuit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McFarland v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Brumley v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Renfro v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Tucker v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Tadlock v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- King v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor ChildCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Phillips v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018