Legal Opinion

State v. Rardon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

¶1 The Defendant and Appellant in this action, William Lester Rardon, acting pro se, has filed with this Court a document entitled “Appellant’s Brief,” in which he requests legal counsel for purposes of this appeal. The State of Montana, through the Attorney General’s office, has filed a brief in response. Appellant’s Brief is hereby deemed a motion for appointment of counsel.

¶2 On March 18, 1997, the State of Montana charged Rardon by Information with one count of sexual intercourse without consent and two counts of sexual assault in the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BlackMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. RardonMontana Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RedfernMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Patton v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API