Legal Opinion

Ragon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1974No. 47232Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

ODOM, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant contends the statute under which he was convicted is void because it does not provide the place where a convicted person is to be confined. His motion for leave to file a motion for rehearing was granted for consideration of this ground only.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of shoplifting, the value of the goods being over fifty dollars. Article 1436e, V.A.P.C., defines the offense of shoplifting, and Section 4(d) thereof provides the penalty applicable to the instant case in the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Ex Parte WynnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Milligan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API