H. & L. M. Warten Cotton Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
' The facts set up in defendant’s special plea, numbered 3, show that the status and obligations of a common carrier had terminated before the destruction of the cotton, and exhibited a complete defense to counts 1, 2, and 5 of the complaint, upon which the cause was tried.
The notice of arrival of the cotton at its destination was, under the terms of the hill of lading, properly given to the Clayton Shoddy & Cotton Mills. Ordinarily the consignee is the only proper party to be notified, but where the shipper is also the consignee, and designates some other person whom the carrier is to notify…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Collins v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Dahlberg Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Southern Railway Co. v. W. T. Adams Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910