Quirico v. Hickory Jackson Ditch Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Defendant in error ditch company, as plaintiff below, sought injunction against Quirico and Kane, grounded upon asserted ownership of a water appropriation out of Rock Creek decreed as of September 24, 1919, to the Alamosa Ditch, and also upon asserted right to divert all the drainage water carried in Bowen Drainage Canal outlet at the point where the same crosses Rock Creek “by contract and filing an application for beneficial use,” and diversion and use of such water for many years. In its complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendants had interfered with its said water rights and diverted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boulder & Weld County Ditch Co. v. Lower Boulder Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- In re German Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- West End Irrigation Co. v. GarveySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Broad Run Investment Co. v. Deuel & Snyder Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Midway Ranches Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Quirico v. Hickory Jackson Ditch CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Public Service Co. v. SignsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Public Service Co. v. SignsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974