Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Spence

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided April 2, 2008No. 5:07-CV-470-DPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES C. DEVER III, District Judge.

Defendants Officer Shawn Spence (“Spence”), Officer Erin Ellerman (“Ellerman”),1 and the City of Henderson, North Carolina (“City”)2 (collectively, “defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiff Joseph M. Cherry, II’s (“Cherry” or “plaintiff’) complaint on multiple grounds under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). Because plaintiff did not properly serve process on any of the defendants he purported to sue, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted.

I

On November 26, 2007, plaintiff filed a pro se complaint. Plaintiff purported to sue Offi*228cer Spence in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koehler v. DodwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Gant v. KantDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
  2. Saimplice v. Ocwen Loan Servicing Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. Pitts v. O'GearyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  4. Faulknor v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  5. Sampson v. Georgia Department of Juvenile JusticeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API