Legal Opinion

Central Production Credit Ass'n v. Reed

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1991No. 16983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff sought recovery based on a promissory note. A jury returned a verdict denying recovery. Plaintiff appeals, contending it should have received a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The question presented is whether the trial court properly submitted for the jury’s consideration defendants’ defense of promissory estoppel. Absent that defense, it is undisputed that plaintiff would be entitled to the judgment it sought. Defendants contend that an authorized employee of plaintiff promised to loan them additional sums, but plaintiff refused to do so.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Labor Discount Center, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Centerre Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Distributors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In Re Marriage of RunezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Southern Missouri Bank v. FogleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lehr v. CollierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Moore v. WeeksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. First Home Savings Bank v. C & L Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. American Realty Trust, Inc. v. First Bank of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. GleasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API