Legal Opinion

Packard v. De Miranda

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1912Published

Appeal from District Court, Maverick County; R. H. Burney, Judge. Action by Celia Carter de Miranda and another against W. L. Packard and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The appellants herein perfected the former appeal to this court, and sought and obtained a reversal of the judgment on the ground that Bonnet was not permitted to testify to all the conversation with the testatrix at the time he prepared the will and deeds. 123 S. W. 710. The evidence was held to be admissible in order to ascertain the intention of the testatrix in regard to the property. Now, when the evidence tends to show a different intention from the one contended for by appellants, they contend that appellees should not be allowed the benefit of the evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barclay v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API